The Short Version turns podcasts into what was actually said. Every
weekday we take the shows worth knowing about — macro, markets, tech,
power — and boil each episode down to the argument, the takeaways, and
the calls, if anyone was brave enough to make them. An hour of someone
talking becomes a few minutes of you reading. You listen to the episodes
that earn it and skip the rest with a clear conscience.
How it works: subscribers get one email every weekday around 6:30am ET —
the morning's index plus the takeaways from each episode. The full reads
live here on the site: the argument, the reasoning, what has to be true
for the person to be right. For now, we do things in categories. You
pick which ones land in your morning email — the links at the bottom of
every digest handle that, plus unsubscribe if it comes to that. No
account settings to dig through, and no passwords anywhere: the email
itself logs you in. Your inbox is your identity around here.
Want a podcast covered? Reply to any digest or email
requests@givemetheshortversion.com.
We'll decide if it makes the cut. "Hey, why do you get to
decide?" Because this thing is free for now. Send money and your opinion
will start carrying real weight around here.
Fair warning: this thing is young and it will change under your feet.
New shows, new categories, new features, the occasional redesign. One
thing coming that we're genuinely excited about — every checkable
prediction a guest makes gets logged and scored when it resolves. People
who make confident calls on podcasts keep receipts now. You'll see it
grow teeth on the site over time.
And since it's early, complaints carry weight. Reply to anything — a
summary that missed the point, a show we should add, a feature that
would make your morning better. Everything gets read, most of it gets
acted on, and the good ideas get stolen immediately.
The Short Version is invite-only for now. Signing up gets you both
halves: the morning email, and full access to every complete summary
on this site.
Have an invite code? Sign up → Odd Lots
Aug 21, 2026 · 52m · 2 min read
Jasmine Sun, reporting for her Substack after a road trip through data-center sites in Michigan and Wisconsin, argues the AI industry misjudged where public backlash would land: not on job-loss or x-risk fears, but on trust — communities don't believe hyperscalers' promises on jobs, taxes, or water use, and that distrust, not information gaps, drives roughly 70/30 opposition in polling regardless of whether a data center is nearby. No new investment calls, but the piece is a live risk map for buildout: deal terms have flipped from towns subsidizing hyperscalers (2023-24) to hyperscalers now expected to pay upfront, NDAs are being dropped as toxic, and small towns face real power asymmetries against companies like OpenAI and Oracle in fights like Saline, Michigan (population under 3,000, sued over zoning after its council voted no).
This is the super-short version — click for the full summary →